Showing posts with label aware. Show all posts
Showing posts with label aware. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Instilling values a complex task

I READ with concern last Saturday's letter supporting the suspension of all sexuality education programmes offered by external agencies ('Schools should stop offering them altogether').

Some of the questionable assumptions underlying the writer's criticisms of the external programmes include:

  • Schools and parents are the primary sources of information on gender and sexuality for young people.
  • Focusing on mainstream views and values of Singapore society will help students learn them and adopt them without question.
  • Making students aware of alternative views and lifestyles is as good as promoting them.
  • All parents and teachers are sufficiently willing and able to teach their children the best values concerning gender and sexuality. These assumptions underestimate the complexity of values education in our contemporary society. The social and cultural environment in which young people are informally educated consists of more than parents and teachers. In today's information society, a child's identity develops under influences that far exceed the censorship of well-meaning adults. Television, cinema, popular music and the Internet, for example, are powerful and pervasive transmitters of popular culture and cosmopolitan values. Such media images of gender roles and sexual behaviour draw on a range of liberal and conservative perspectives. To what extent does the formal curriculum in schools teach students to critically analyse these diverse media messages so as to help them make responsible, well- informed decisions for themselves? Censoring all alternative views would be contrary to the Ministry of Education's (MOE) push for critical thinking. If argumentative essays at the secondary and junior college levels can encourage students to engage both sides of the 'pro-life' and 'pro- choice' abortion debate, why should not this balanced approach be similarly extended to the controversial topics of gender roles and sexual orientation? A mature curriculum for sexuality education should reflect not only the mainstream views and values of Singapore's society but also an educated awareness of alternative views based on well- researched knowledge and information. Perhaps, MOE would be wise to consult students for their views on what ought to be included in a 21st century sexuality education curriculum. Our children are often more precocious than we give them credit for. Silencing their views in favour of the dominant conservatism is itself a kind of prejudice against the ability of young people to think for themselves. Warren Mark Liew
 

Read More...

Sunday, May 10, 2009

Mothers, talk to your kids about the birds and the bees

Carl Joseph Walker-Hoover was every parent's dream. A Boy Scout, he scored good grades at school, loved football and helped out at the local church.

Yet, after dinner on April 6, the Massachusetts boy wrapped an extension cord around his neck and killed himself. He was 11.

Ten days later, on April 16, Jaheem Herrera from Georgia hanged himself with a fabric belt, hours after returning home with glowing grades. He too was 11.

Both families say that relentless taunts by schoolmates who called them 'gay' drove the boys to their deaths. The schools have not denied their allegations.

Carl's mother had even complained repeatedly to her son's school about the homophobic slurs she said he encountered every day.

The deaths - not the first in recent years - have ignited a debate in the American media on bullying and some are asking whether churches and overzealous parents are pushing their own anti-gay religious agenda too far, too fast.

But at a prayer service for her son Jaheem late last month, preaching hatred and ascribing blame were not on Ms Masika Bermudez's mind.

Instead, the weeping mother told parents everywhere to convey a simple yet significant message to their children: 'Whatever your problems, don't be afraid to talk to your mother.'

And on this Mother's Day, that's a message Singaporeans too should take seriously.

Over the past month, Singapore has been rocked by an acrimonious debate over the extent to which school programmes should discuss homosexuality, thanks to the goings-on at the Association of Women for Action and Research (Aware).

In late March, a group of Christian women took over the reins at Singapore's best-known women's group in what was widely regarded as a constitutional coup.

Many of them were mothers and feared that the Aware leaders they had just ousted were promoting homosexuality through sexuality education programmes that the group conducted in a handful of government schools.

But these new leaders were themselves voted out of office early this month at an extraordinary general meeting.

Aware, meanwhile, clarified that its discussions of homosexuality - which was referred to in 'neutral' rather than 'negative' terms - took up less than five minutes of its three-hour sex education programme.

In the most recent development, the Ministry of Education (MOE) announced last Wednesday that it was suspending all external sex education programmes, including those conducted by Aware. It reiterated that all such programmes would reflect 'mainstream views and values of Singapore society, where the social norm consists of the married, heterosexual family unit'.

MOE's decision is not surprising in principle, since homosexual acts are against the law here. However, that decision does not mean an end to the issue. Schools will continue to have to grapple with how to deal with students with homosexual tendencies as well as bullies who hurl homophobic taunts.

Teasing boys for being gay or girlish is not unheard of in schools here, though some schools are dealing with it firmly.

Late last month, three boys from a popular secondary school were publicly caned for taunting a younger student for his 'girly voice'.

In its statement on Wednesday, MOE reminded parents that it was they - and not schools - who bore the ultimate responsibility for shaping their children's views of the world.

I could not agree more. But still, the decision has seeded some worries in me.

Children tend to see things in black and white. Tolerance and understanding moral ambiguities are not things that come naturally to them.

With the suspension of the Aware programme, will 'gay' now become a lethal new addition to the verbal arsenal of school bullies here? Will Mums and Dads be around to talk to confused and shy kids about sex and sexuality?

Most importantly, will parents teach their children that irrespective of how they view sexuality, all individuals deserve dignity and respect?

Counsellors such as Dr Carol Balhetchet from the Singapore Children's Society say that parents here remain as reluctant to discuss sex and sexuality with their children as they were 15 years ago.

But unlike then, the danger now is that children have a sea of information - much of it baseless or plain corrupt - just a mouse-click away. Newspapers, too, often report on the issue.

Indeed, it was after reading a Straits Times report on Elton John's marriage in late 2005 that my daughter, then nearly eight, wondered aloud whether it was possible for 'a man to marry a man'.

'Yes, in some countries,' I said cryptically, hoping that the mega fan of the Lion King singer would not probe further.

She did not. For her, it was just another new thing she learnt that day.

The hard questions came last week, more than three years later. Eleven now and far more aware of the moral ambiguities in our imperfect world, she asked whether I thought gays were 'weird'.

I answered that they definitely were not - but that many people thought that homosexuality was wrong.

Harder questions followed and I took pains to emphasise that while people may differ on whether homosexuality was wrong or not, in my book, being a liar, a thief, a bully - or just plain intolerant of other points of view - were the real 'sins'.

As we spoke late into the night, I told her of the two little boys in America - who were her age - who lost their battle against anti-gay bullies.

My mind wandered back to Ms Bermudez's plea. I was speaking to my child, even before she had any 'problems'.

But would other mothers?

As we celebrate Mother's Day, I have but one plea for fellow Mums. Talk to your children. And pray that when they face dilemmas - and peer pressure - in navigating our complex and diverse world, they turn to you for advice. Always.

Happy Mother's Day.

 

Read More...

Saturday, May 9, 2009

Practise reason, fairness in re-evaluating modules

I REFER to Thursday's letter, 'Why MOE suspended Aware project'. I understand and applaud the cautious stance of the Ministry of Education (MOE) in response to public feedback.

Although I realise it is preferable to allow programmes that 'adhere to the social norms and values' of society, I also believe education must inform, sometimes against public opinion. I hope the suspension is not a knee-jerk reaction that will move us backwards.

The Aware event has allowed homosexuality and the opinions people hold about the issue to be discussed openly. Any future move should not ignore this step forward that has been taken.

I hope that MOE, in its re-evaluation of the sexual education modules by Aware and other vendors, will practise reason and fairness.

Homosexuality as a condition exists in both the human world and the animal kingdom. The reasons for its existence are not clear, just as no scientist is clear why flowers bloom in different colours. Whether it is a negative or positive condition is subject to beliefs that can originate from an individual's cultural and religious background. These beliefs should not be allowed to colour the science or deny the existence of homosexuality.

It is essential information our children and youth are already aware of, have questions about and some inevitably wrestle with.

A reasonable, non-biased and progressive education system should not promote homosexuality; nor should it deny or present only the negative aspects of it.

To do anything less is to rob our children and youth of their right to full information and knowledge, and this will have negative ramifications for their lives and their interactions with others who are different in society.

Alicia Wong (Ms)

 

Read More...

Aware programme 'exceeded guidelines'

PARENTS are quite right to be concerned about some parts of the Association of Women for Action and Research's (Aware) sexuality education programme, Senior Minister of State for Education S. Iswaran said yesterday.

He said that after investigations were conducted into the programme, 'there's a sense that they have exceeded the guidelines'.

On Wednesday, the Ministry of Education (MOE) said that all sexuality education programmes run by external groups in schools will be suspended until a new, tougher vetting process for such programmes is put in place.

Among the suspended programmes was the controversial one by Aware. The ministry had said it had some suggested responses which are 'explicit and inappropriate, and convey messages which could promote homosexuality or suggest approval of premarital sex'.

Neither the ministry nor Mr Iswaran gave details of which parts of the Aware programme they were referring to.

The basic instructor's guide for Aware's programme, a copy of which was posted online, contained lines such as 'anal sex can be healthy or neutral if practised with consent and with a condom', and 'homosexuality is perfectly normal. Just like heterosexuality, it is simply the way you are'.

Speaking after a community event yesterday, Mr Iswaran said the core sexuality programme devised by the MOE would continue in schools.

This programme, he stressed, strives to keep sexuality education in line with mainstream values in Singapore.

It is based on the family as the basic unit and conservative mainstream values in Singapore, he said.

Asked yesterday if the ministry was negligent in taking so long to uncover the specifics of the Aware programme, Mr Iswaran explained that there are more than 350 schools here, and they are given considerable autonomy.

Teachers and principals are working on a range of matters, he said. This being the case, 'it is understandable that from time to time, there might be instances', referring to programmes which do not meet the ministry's guidelines.

Mr Iswaran's comments come slightly over a week after he said the MOE had not received any complaints about Aware's programme and saw no reason to intervene.

Two days later, however, the ministry said it would investigate.

Yesterday, when asked what prompted the change, Mr Iswaran would say only that some complaints were received.

The MOE has told The Straits Times it has received more than 100 e-mail messages and calls about the Aware programme since last week.

Contacted yesterday about how he decided to engage Aware, the principal of a secondary school said the school's head of pupil development met the group a few times to discuss the programme's content.

The principal - who did not want his name or that of his school to be used - then agreed to engage the group for one session.

After this, however, he decided to stop the sessions as 'some of the values communicated were different from what the school believes in and the programme was not a good fit'. He did not elaborate.

The principal added: 'Some organisations can talk until the cows come home about how well they can deliver the programme, but you never know how good the fit is until you actually try it.'

 

Read More...

Thursday, May 7, 2009

External sex education programmes suspended in schools

ALL sexuality education programmes run by external groups in schools - including the controversial one by the Association of Women for Action and Research (Aware) - have been suspended by the Ministry of Education (MOE).

In addition, the ministry will implement a new, tougher vetting process for the selection of such external programmes by schools.

The move comes about a week after some parents told MOE that they were concerned about the content found in an instructor guide for Aware's programme, which was posted online.

The Aware programme for schools was one of the touchstones of a spat within the organisation, which ended last Saturday with the ousting of a month-old leadership team who had railed against what they called 'pro-homosexuality' content in it.

MOE conducted an investigation after some parents expressed concern.

Yesterday, the press secretary to Education Minister Ng Eng Hen, Ms Jennifer Chan, said in a letter to The Straits Times that the basic instructor guide for Aware's programme did not conform to MOE's guidelines on sexuality education.

'In particular, some suggested responses in the instructor guide are explicit and inappropriate, and convey messages which could promote homosexuality or suggest approval of premarital sex,' she said, without elaborating on the inappropriate responses.

A copy of the guide posted online contained lines such as 'anal sex can be healthy or neutral if practised with consent and with a condom', and 'homosexuality is perfectly normal. Just like heterosexuality, it is simply the way you are'.

However, Ms Chan pointed out that some parts of the guide were positive: It gave accurate information on sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and HIV, for example.

But, she stressed, the ministry and its schools 'do not promote alternative lifestyles to our students'.

She added: 'MOE's framework for sexuality education reflects mainstream views and values of Singapore society, where the social norm consists of the married heterosexual family unit.

'Parents are ultimately responsible for inculcating values to their children, and the MOE's sexuality education programme aims to complement parents' roles in helping students make informed, responsible and values-based decisions about sexuality.'

The ministry, she said, had reviewed the current process used to select external groups to run school programmes, and found that they could be improved.

It will also do more to ensure that training materials and programmes in schools are in line with its framework on sexuality education, and will review ways to give parents more information about sexuality education.

Other groups which conduct sexuality programmes in schools include the Singapore Planned Parenthood Association and the Family Life Society.

The new leadership of Aware said it was not surprised by MOE's move. It said it stood by its programme, but was prepared to make changes if necessary.

In a statement, it said the instructor guide was a confidential document used strictly for instructor training.

'Like all instructor guides, ours contains far more information than is used. The guide includes possible responses for instructors should certain topics, such as homosexuality and premarital sex, be raised during sessions,' it said.

'They are not necessarily the responses actually used, as our instructors always use language and terms appropriate to their audience.'

The statement added that Aware's aim has always been to help students make 'informed and responsible decisions about their sexuality in the context of values taught by their parents'.

Meanwhile, senior lawyer Thio Su Mien, the self-described 'feminist mentor' of the ousted Aware leadership, said she was 'pleased' that MOE had looked into the matter and acted in a 'responsible fashion'.

Former president Josie Lau declined comment.

Several parents contacted also welcomed the move.

Mr Vincent Lim, a 34-year-old private tutor and father of two young children, said: 'It is good news for parents. I hope that educators focus on inculcating strong family values and having stable relationships in our sex education programme. The family is the backbone of society.'

 

Read More...

Earn $$ with WidgetBucks!